photo by pattyequalsawesome
Sometimes you run across derivatives of the same idea from multiple sources and it gets you to stop and listen.
Two recent examples have come from Netflix and Miles Davis.
Ultimately, it’s about how best to maintain a leadership position by enabling those around you to explore new boundaries. Leading and corralling rather than managing.
Netflix has posted a rather lengthy, but worthwhile slide show about their culture and how they work. They put it best by asking their managers to provide ‘context, not control’ (slides 76 - 84). In essence, describe where you want to go, not how you want to get there.
And The Miles Davis Story (as relayed by a friend) explored Miles’ proclivity to assemble talented musicians, set the mood for the evening and then walk around the stage as they do their thing. His job was to capture each individual’s wandering explorations and create something cohesive out of it. Sometimes it worked brilliantly. Often it didn’t. But his purpose was to create something that hadn’t been felt before. To do that you have to be willing to try things that don’t pan out.
It takes a unique type of person to be able to lead in this manner.
It’s no wonder that people who are at the top of their game are attracted by this environment. If you’re looking to set the direction for your industry then it’s a leadership style worth considering.
photo by mrpattersonsir
Work is draining. For many, rare are the days when we leave the office feeling energized.
As a manager you have to recognize that people are going through this. Chances are you are too. But change has to start somewhere.
Sure, technically your job is to make sure the ball is being advanced down the field. But if your team is too exhausted (or detached) to run the plays how far is the ball going to move?
Your real job is to make deposits into the emotional bank so that when the inevitable time comes when the team needs to hunker down and everything has gone sideways that people are present, engaged and have the persistence to get through the rough patches.
From the employees perspective, they have gone out of their way to make the relationship work. They started in their role excited and ready to roll up their sleeves and make a real difference. But every slight along the way has made a withdrawal on their emotional involvement with you, the team and with the company.
It all adds up and you may be responsible for making many of those emotional withdrawals. If you expect them to dig in then you need to exert the energy to refill that account.
Focus on your people. Feed them the projects that keep them energized. Recognize they’re all different and build those relationships accordingly. People do want to be treated differently. They’re not all the same and not universally motivated by the same things.
Start today. Hold one on ones that don’t focus on tasks but rather the individual. The work will still get done.
photo by .mw
A few days ago we saw what it means to be the leader of a team and Alberto Contador clearly wasn’t it.
Today provided us another good lesson, compliments of Messr. Contador. He was riding comfortably behind two rival challengers and one of his teammates who also happened to be contending for a podium finish. In the next frame, Contador stands on his pedals and tries to break away. The two rival contenders chased him down, but his teammate did not.
Ultimately, Contador may have knocked his teammate out of a top three result and may have cost his team a chance at sweeping the podium for the first time in 85 years. All for a shot at proving his strength (though he was chased down) or to gain an additional ten seconds, at best, on his rivals over the course of the final of the mile climb (this would have been easily made up downhill).
There was no point.
This is a clear example of when having an ‘A’ player on your team actually makes your team weaker. In a business setting this may be the star who doesn’t communicate, doesn’t allow others the opportunity to shine or throws his teammates under the bus in external situations.
His results may be stellar, but the team’s cumulative results decrease when he’s added to the team.
Don’t get so blinded by the seemingly shooting star that you lose sight of your collective team’s performance. We often start to blame the others for being inferior. In reality, we’re promoting bad behaviors, poor values and deteriorating the morale on our team.
‘Stars’ are great and we should all be so lucky to have them, but if they don’t play well with others then what good are they?
—
Note: I believe we oversimplify when we see business people in a caste view. The rankings are fluid. ‘A’ players don’t exist independently of an organization. And who you’d view as a ‘B’ or a ‘C’ player on paper could be enormously valuable and raise a level or two on your team. More on that here.
We all want to hire people who are going to make a difference. Who will drive our businesses forward.
We want people who will remain engaged long after the honeymoon period.
The circle of engagement is pretty clear. An employee likes her job so she works hard and does well which in turn produces rewards that matter to her so she tries harder still.
But where is the on-ramp? What fuels this virtuous cycle?
photo by robotography
It’s easy to put the onus on the employee by saying you’re paying well, you have free yoga classes and M&Ms. But none of those spin the wheel. Despite what you may think those are only ‘nice to haves’ for most people. People who are intrinsically motivated to do something amazing.
You’ve spent a lot of time and money to bring the new employee on-board. So why not suck up your pride and take that first step? Do everything in your power to ensure the people you hire succeed?
Engagement is a two-way street. There is give and take on both sides, but we far too often neglect the new employee and trust them to ‘quickly get up to speed.’
Take the lead in engaging your employees and that lead will be followed.
We’re all in the same business.
We may produce different things, but that doesn’t change anything. With off-shoring and 100-years to optimize the process, production is a commodity. Everyone can tap into efficient, quality production (lead-laden toys notwithstanding).
In fact, we’ve been in this business for a half-century and we aren’t getting any better at it.
We are all in the people business, of course.
Your job is to turn brain waves into cash (hat tip). If you thought you’d misplaced your competitive advantage, you’ll find it there.
photo by gilles chiroleu
In 1957 the U.S. hit the inflection point whereby we started thinking more than producing. White-collar workers outnumbered blue-collar workers for the first time. Since then the spread has only increased, but we haven’t changed our mindset about how we work.
We are still trying to get more from less by using the same approaches we used 100-years ago. Basically, work longer then work smarter then finally give up and off-shore everything.
But we’re left with an economy and business scenario that is entirely different. The job today is to optimize people’s thoughts.
Optimizing people is far different than optimizing people operating machines.
A couple starting points to keep in mind to make the transition from acting like a production line manager to a brain wave herder.
I could go on, but then I’d have nothing left to write about. Please add your own or challenge me on any of these. My thinking is always a work in process and it’s hard to do alone.
Copyright ©2008-2009 RoundPegg Inc.