A few days ago we saw what it means to be the leader of a team and Alberto Contador clearly wasn’t it.
Today provided us another good lesson, compliments of Messr. Contador. He was riding comfortably behind two rival challengers and one of his teammates who also happened to be contending for a podium finish. In the next frame, Contador stands on his pedals and tries to break away. The two rival contenders chased him down, but his teammate did not.
Ultimately, Contador may have knocked his teammate out of a top three result and may have cost his team a chance at sweeping the podium for the first time in 85 years. All for a shot at proving his strength (though he was chased down) or to gain an additional ten seconds, at best, on his rivals over the course of the final of the mile climb (this would have been easily made up downhill).
There was no point.
This is a clear example of when having an ‘A’ player on your team actually makes your team weaker. In a business setting this may be the star who doesn’t communicate, doesn’t allow others the opportunity to shine or throws his teammates under the bus in external situations.
His results may be stellar, but the team’s cumulative results decrease when he’s added to the team.
Don’t get so blinded by the seemingly shooting star that you lose sight of your collective team’s performance. We often start to blame the others for being inferior. In reality, we’re promoting bad behaviors, poor values and deteriorating the morale on our team.
‘Stars’ are great and we should all be so lucky to have them, but if they don’t play well with others then what good are they?
—
Note: I believe we oversimplify when we see business people in a caste view. The rankings are fluid. ‘A’ players don’t exist independently of an organization. And who you’d view as a ‘B’ or a ‘C’ player on paper could be enormously valuable and raise a level or two on your team. More on that here.
Lance Armstrong’s reemergence at the Tour de France has created an interesting plot line. Namely, who leads a team with two leaders?
Believe it or not, cycling is a team sport. It takes several unselfish teammates, called domestiques, who are willing to do more than their fair share of work in order to help someone else get the glory.
Most teams, therefore, are set up to have one acknowledged leader who has an opportunity to win the race and for whom everyone else protects and works. Lance, however, joined a team that had the winner of the 2006 Tour de France and arguably the strongest rider in the world today, Alberto Contador.
Last Friday was a day the rift in the team became publicly known. The team’s game plan had been to control the tempo of the first big climbs by riding out in front and doing the hard work. Then with a couple miles to go Contador attacked Lance and his teammates to recapture a few seconds and leapfrog Lance by two seconds in the overall standings.
After the race everyone from Lance to the other Astana teammates to the race director agreed that Contador’s attack wasn’t part of the plan. Lance, to his credit, said that his job right now was to the team and he stayed with the pack to ensure that no attacks from major competitors were forthcoming.
While arguments can be made that it was a shrewd move from a strong rider, it’s a team sport and a repeated game. There are two weeks left and Contador will need his team to help him if he stands any shot of winning.
So to break from the team plan in order to put himself in a better position made it known where his priorities lie. It’s all about him, not the team.
A leader and a team make one another better. It’s a symbiotic relationship where both fail without the other.
Sometimes in order to lead you have to hold yourself back and pull your teammates with you. Other times they will be pulling you. But you can be sure that when your motivation is individual glory and you pay no heed to the effort they’ve put in on your behalf that they will find it far more difficult to go to that well again. They will start asking themselves what’s in it for them? They’ll need to know that you have their back just as they always have theirs.
To lead a team give your team what you want in return. You’re not a team leader after all if nobody is following.
Regrettably, I forgot the most important lesson learned, or remembered, from cycling.
This reminds me of a quote I read once from a sailor in the Whitbread Round the World Race. Commenting on the icebergs around Cape Horn (paraphrasing), “We really have to navigate carefully during the day as the icebergs are all over the place. Fortunately, they disappear at night.”
Phew… it’s a few weeks since I’ve written. In the meantime (in order of occurrence, not importance), I’ve parted ways with my former employer, gotten married and become hopelessly addicted to cycling.
While only riding for three months now, I’ve met a ton of great people and rekindled the Kaizen spirit within that had gone dormant for a bit. As if that’s not enough to get one addicted it’s also helped me focus in on what really matters in my life. A few examples:
Anyhow, gotta go. I haven’t been on the bike all day and I’m getting the shakes.
Copyright ©2008-2009 RoundPegg Inc.